Please Be Seated
Watching NBC’s Meet the Press yesterday morning, I was not mightily impressed with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s explanation for why the Senate Democratic Caucus has the constitutional authority to deny Roland Burris his appointment to fill Barack Obama’s vacated U.S. Senate seat. I am not a lawyer, but my sense of the Constitution is that the Senate can deny Burris the seat only if he does not meet the constitutionally-mandated requirements for office. Reid stated yesterday that this hurdle is not an issue for Burris, which leaves the Majority Leader on pretty shaky ground.
Rod Blagojevich is still the duly elected governor of Illinois, and has not yet been indicted by the Justice Department. Democrats may not like the pall that the whole seamy Blagojevich episode is casting on their January return to unified government, but that is a political matter, not a constitutional one. They should seat Burris and let the chips fall where they may, in terms of their ability to hold onto the seat in 2010.
That said, Congressman Bobby Rush’s recent comments that to deny Burris the seat would represent a legislative “lynching,” are equally ridiculous. The issue here is not whether Democrats want to prevent an African-American from returning to the Senate, but whether they can prevent a loss of the Illinois seat at the next midterm elections. While there may be strategic questions about who will have the broadest appeal for the Illinois electorate, where the political interests of Chicagoland and Downstate Illinois are often at odds, I don’t think race is playing into this in the way Rush suggested.
Posted On: 01-07-2009 13:32:45 by Jim Splaine
Post your comment below.